The new Wilson Staff Model golf balls are a bit of a phenomenon.
We’re not talking about performance. Rather, it’s your interest in Wilson Staff products and specifically the new Staff Model golf balls. Soon after their release in January, you told us you wanted to know more.
Rest assured: A Ball Lab quality teardown is in the works. Also, know the Wilson Staff Model golf balls will be part of our next MyGolfSpy ball test. But it’s fascinating to note your interest far outpaces Wilson’s relative golf ball market share. We’re not sure what that means but it must mean something.
Among other things.
(Hey, analogies are a perfectly acceptable literary device. Even this one.)
What Are the Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls All About?
Wilson Staff Model golf balls hit the shelves in the spring of 2020 during the COVID lockdown. There was just one Staff Model model and it was a surprise performer in the 2021 MyGolfSpy Ball Test with the second-fastest ball speed of any ball tested. It finished 1/100th mph behind the category-leading Titleist Pro V1x Left Dash.
Several new balls leapfrogged the Staff Model in last year’s testing. But 2024 is a new year, and if you’re looking for a direct upgrade to the original Staff Model ball, you’ll find it in the Staff Model X.
Here’s where you need to start paying attention. The new Staff Model X, as we just told you, is the replacement for the old Staff Model ball. The new Staff Model ball is a completely new ball that’s not replacing anything.
Read that again. There will be a quiz later.
“We found during testing that some of our Tour players don’t want the absolute maximum amount of spin,” explains Simonutti. “These players were actually backing up the old ball too much for their particular game.”
Just So: How Did The Staff Model Get Softer?
“What we did was recreate the Staff Model for lower spin off short irons, actually across all irons,” says Simonutti. “I’d say by about five percent. It’s also lower spin off the driver, which some players prefer.”
Don’t take that to mean the Staff Model is a low-spinning marshmallow. Wilson lists the Staff Model compression at 94 (Staff Model X is listed at 104) and it still spins like a Tour ball should.
Making a Tour-level ball a little softer isn’t that big of a trick. It’s done primarily by changing the chemistry in the core.
“Unless you go out of your way to make it otherwise, all golf ball cores are softer on the inside than they are on the outside,” Simonutti explains. “It’s a peroxide cure with an exothermic reaction. The heat gets into the core from the outside. That’s the part that crosslinks first.
“There are things you can do to increase the difference between the firmness on the outside and the softness on the inside. If you’re going to make the core softer at the center, you’re going to reduce spin rate.”
How Golf Balls Get Their Ball Speed
Firmness and ball speed go hand in hand. Generally speaking, the firmer the golf ball, the more ball speed it will deliver. You can go overboard.
“I’ve made test balls that I know are way too hard,” says Simonutti. “I make them just to see how fast I can make a ball off the driver while still falling within USGA initial velocity limits. The problem is they might as well be rocks.”
Believe it or not, urethane covers also play a role in ball speed. Just not a very good one.
That’s one benefit of cast urethane versus injection molded urethane. Depending on the process, you can make a cast urethane cover considerably thinner. Generally speaking, injection urethane covers are around 40/1000ths of an inch thick. Cast urethane covers can get as thin as 25/1000ths.
“The only thing that helps with speed is the fact that there’s less urethane,” says Simonutti. “It has less of a negative impact on speed because there’s less of it on the ball.”
How Dimples Make a Ball Go Higher or Lower
We often joke at the office about how, whenever any OEM tests its products against the competition, it never seems to lose. Wilson says in testing with its Tour players and advisory staff, the new Staff Model X was faster than the ball that player was currently using, in every case.
But there’s always an asterisk.
“In our testing and in our conditions, we find it to be the longest,” says Simonutti. “But different golfers have different launch conditions. What’s longest for one player isn’t necessarily longest for another.”
“When you have a higher-spinning, faster ball, it’s going to tend to fly higher than a two-piece ball,” says Simonutti. “You’re going to need a dimple pattern that provides a lower trajectory.”
Without getting into lift, drag, air streams and other aerodynamic science, dimples can be summed up thusly:
Balls with deeper dimples fly lower. Balls with shallow dimples fly higher. That’s why you’ll find firm, fast Tour-level balls with, relatively speaking, deeper dimple patterns to create what we like to call a “penetrating” ball flight. Softer, two-piece balls spin less and tend to fly lower. Those balls have a shallower dimple pattern to keep them up in the air longer to maximize potential distance.
How Do Golf Balls Get Their Compression?
In many ways, golf ball compression is like iron shaft flex in that there’s no industry standard. Compression machines measure differently and different companies use different methodologies. For example, the new Wilson Staff Model X golf ball compression is listed at 104 on Wilson’s website. In our 2023 Ball Test, we measured the old Staff Model ball at 99.
“The differential between what you guys read and what we read on our machine is the same differential we see between what you read and what we read on other balls,” Simonutti says. “But the problem is compression is not an industry standard.”
“Whenever I read a Bridgestone or a Dunlop Sumitomo (Srixon) patent, their compression is always defined as deformation under a 100-kilogram load.”
Wilson uses its Tour players and advisory staff to test for “perceived” firmness, which is a totally subjective metric.
Hmm, maybe Tour pros aren’t all that different from the rest of us, after all.
Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls: Just So …
When it comes to golfers and their golf balls, there are three types of relationships. First, there’s what we call the “Ride or Die” golfers. You can tell who they are in the comment sections of blogs because they refer to their ball as “my Pro V1” or “my Snells.” They’ll give up a kidney before they switch balls.
Then there is the “Soft Parade.” These folks like soft feel as an attribute. That could mean a mid- to upper-80s compression for something with Tour-level performance or it could be a low-priced, two-piece ionomer ball with compression in the 40s.
As a dedicated “Ball Jumper,” I’ve gamed the Staff Model X for several rounds this year (For the record, I jump between Bridgestone, Srixon, Titleist and Wilson). For my game, it performs as advertised.
MyGolfSpy’s next ball test will provide real data, and we’ll know if improvements to the Staff Model X put it back on the ball speed medal stand. Anecdotally, we can say the Wilson Staff Model balls don’t leave anything on the table compared to Tour-level balls from Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Srixon or Bridgestone. Depending on your game, you might even pick up a little something.
This article was written in partnership with Wilson.
The post Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls: A MyGolfSpy “Just So” Story appeared first on MyGolfSpy.